Thursday, 19 April 2012

The impact of the proposed EU data reforms


The Confederation of British Industry (CBI), a UK business lobbying organisation, has shared its concerns over the proposed changes to the EU data protection regulations; specifically, the potential financial impact on businesses as well as the risk of data compliance restrictions stifling innovation.

The CBI argues that many innovative business models, citing advertising and the music industry as examples, rely on data-sharing to generate revenue and ensure they are providing a tailored user experience and suggests that proposed reforms would restrict businesses’ ability to do this.

In addition to implementing data-sharing restrictions, the CBI highlights the financial consequence of complying with the reforms. The European Commission claims that its proposals will save businesses €2.3 billion a year, across all EU countries, by creating a coherent and streamlined approval process for organisations working across EU states. However, the CBI believes that this is an overestimation of the business benefits and overlooks compliance costs such as changing IT systems, re-training staff, implementing call centres to handle data compliance issues and, in some cases, appointing a Data Protection Officer. While costs are likely to be incurred in order to comply, businesses need to carefully consider the potential cost should they suffer a data breach.

Businesses could potentially face fines of up to two percent of their revenues should they fail to report a breach in the 24 hour time period and the cost to brand reputation should not be overlooked either, as recently demonstrated in the news reports surrounding Global Payments’ data breach.

Those that choose to implement a document management system mitigate the risk of suffering a data breach and incurring huge fines as their documents containing sensitive data are stored in a central, secure system. Other cost burdens that the CBI highlight, such as re-training and IT refresh, would also be significantly reduced, if not eliminated, as the document system is integrated with existing IT infrastructure, improving ease of use.

Click here to find out more about how a document management system could help improve your data protection processes. 

Tuesday, 17 April 2012

Housing Associations open spending data


Housing Minister, Grant Shapps seems to be making progress with his campaign to push for Housing Associations to make spending data public knowledge – with at least two housing associations, Hertfordshire Housing and Viridian Housing agreeing to open up spending data from next month.

Hertfordshire Housing and Viridian Housing are responsible for around 5,300 and 16,000 properties respectively, with the associations expected to publish the details of all spending which is above £500, and of any salaries which are over £50,000.

The call for greater visibility of spending data follows pressure to expose how public monies are being spent – organisations which receive money from the tax payer should now expect to come under greater scrutiny and be willing to explain financial decisions openly and honestly.

The ability to be able to share this data however will require housing associations to have in place a system which will ensure that all monies spent are being accounted for and accessible – with information being able to be readily accessed.

Although not public bodies, the housing sector in particular takes in money from taxpayers – the majority of which is invested in social housing, with this in mind surely it is only reasonable to share how this investment is being spent? Other public sector areas should beware, with the growing trend of openness and honesty with public spending it is only a matter of time before they too will have to review the systems which they have in place.

Tuesday, 10 April 2012

Compliance headaches and inefficiencies


Regulatory burdens have always been in evidence. However, the landscape has changed greatly in recent years. The banking crisis, Enron et al and increasingly sophisticated, technically savvy and organised fraudsters are all high profile wake-up calls demanding a support network. That comes in the shape of legislation, regulation from professional and overseeing bodies and peer pressure for better practice.
Anti-Money Laundering, KYC, Suitability, FATCA etc mean that brokers, wealth managers and IFAs are exposed to a range of potentially threatening issues. With massive consequences for failure there’s increasing operational effort and expense needed to keep on top. Working practices evolve but, more often than not, they generate increased operational workload. As the burden compounds then you can be sure that the potential penalties for exceptions will also be rising. It’s no surprise that the numbers of compliance-facing staff therefore continue to rise. Against an economic backdrop where efficiency and cost savings are more important than ever this is a recipe for greater overheads with no appreciable return.
This latest Invu white paper examines a selction of issues faced by businesses in the finance sector, in particular the broking and wealth management communities. It’s not exhaustive but it does pick up some of the significant issues faced on a daily basis and some that are on the way. Many of these issues are burdens which IFAs, insurers, mortgage advisors and even accountants in practice face. Whilst setting these out we also identify the role of technology in mitigating them, most notably, of coure, via document based solutions.
Find out what role document solutions can play in mitigating the risks and reducing the day-to-day compliance impact and download the Wealth Management – the case for eDM” from our resources section at www.invu.net

Friday, 30 March 2012

Coutts AML penalty – how come?


Coutts private bank, a division of the Royal Bank of Scotland, has been fined £8.75m by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) for not displaying adequate measures to prevent money laundering. After reviewing 103 high-risk customer files the FSA found deficiencies in at least 73 of them.

The bank has received the largest fine of its sort for breaching anti money laundering (AML) rules, after three years of ‘systemic’ problems in handling client affairs vulnerable to corruption because of customers’ political links.

The FSA found, after an industry-wide review in October 2010, that the bank was not conducting robust enough checks, nor were they monitoring relationships with high-risk customers to a satisfactory degree or verifying origins of deposits being made. Therefore, any suspicious funds being laundered through the account were not being highlighted.

The failings displayed by Coutts have been labelled as ‘significant, widespread and unacceptable’ with its conduct falling well below the standards expected. The fine which has been awarded to Coutts demonstrates the severity with which the FSA is regarding anti money laundering and should serve as a sharp reminder to other major players in the industry.

But surely avoidance of such fines is simple? Banks should surely have in place a system with which to manage and track any irregular activities which could highlight money laundering or suspicious behaviour around customer accounts. Inherently manual in part, AML relies largely on clients providing physical evidence of identity. Through automating the processes involved in the manual collection of data, a client can be identified and then linked into an online data provider to perform the necessary checks automatically. The processes, infrastructure and technology are all available, so why was this allowed to happen?

Electronic data management not only brings a joined-up process to AML, but also reduces the time taken to perform previously onerous checks. It turns a time consuming task, prone to error, into a background function taking minutes. Our work in the wealth management space proves that compliance can be joined up and effective.

And as if this time and cost saving wasn’t enough, there is then the small matter of avoiding crippling fines for failing to prevent data misuse, and all at the click of a button or two.

Wednesday, 28 March 2012

Stamping out business costs?

Ouch! There can’t be many of the day-to-day business staples that suddenly rise by in excess of 30% but that’s what’s happening to the humble stamp. For a standard letter size, first class stamps are to rise from 46p to 60p. and second class stamps from 36p to 50p. Then there’s the uplift for the bigger letters and packets too. Ofcom’s taken the brakes off so we’ll be getting used to postal service charges increasing as Royal Mail seeks to balance its books whilst simultaneously investing in major modernisation.

For those issuing paper invoices, contracts and correspondence or marketing literature then the franking machine will be costing you a lot more this year. For professional firms like accountants this is a particular headache. In these days of social networking, e-commerce and even old-fashioned email the continuing volumes of paper based documents can be a surprise. However, the fact is that post can be a significant cost for some businesses. This is another burden which makes it all the more difficult to keep a lid on costs.

Of course, dealing with documents electronically removes this. Storing and actioning all correspondence, invoices etc via document management solutions is a logical approach. When something simply has to go out by post then it should be the exception rather than the rule, email and e-commerce the norm. Secure portals and digital signing tools further cement the move away from post. We’re delighted that we’re on the cusp of launching a joint initiative to market with accountancy web and content specialists PracticeWEB to enable portal connectivity. Having security and immediate access in the office and for clients and suppliers joins up the way we work, without the inherent delay of post and without bumping up costs 30% at a time.

Tuesday, 27 March 2012

2012 Budget increases business costs – what else is in store?


Personal storage has been a growing business over the last 10 years. The likes of Big Yellow, Access, Loknstore, Safestore and a plethora of other smaller rivals have grown up to supplement local offerings. Of course, this phenomenon simply augments the existing business  requirement. This is a demand driven not just by spare bits of office furniture, exhibition materials and other detritus but also frequently by compliance with legislation and regulatory need. It’s also feared by paranoia about customer service and risk. We’re talking filing and paper records here – mountains and mountains of it. For many knowledge based businesses keeping records for 6 years and more is just part of day to day operations. For accountants, lawyers, architects, brokers and others there will be paper records which go back for years.

At a time when cash flow is king then it’s just one more piece of aggravation and cost to find that off-site storage will be on the rise. At least that’s what will happen if the Budget announcement to close a loophole which exempts storage from VAT becomes law on 1st October as planned. Forecasters are already projecting a drop in profits for the big storage outlets. If you have your archives off site then be prepared to pay twice from October – the VAT you can reclaim back of course, but the underlying storage price is also likely to nudge north a little as the suppliers seek to claw back the revenues lost from the personal market.

None of this is an issue for those businesses with the foresight to take on board suitable systems. Document and content management is a core requirement for the professional firm nowadays. It’s not just the tangible enhancement in everyday efficiency, the client service improvements and the peace of mind. They know that they are in good shape when it comes to statutory and regulatory compliance. They get clear competitive advantage. Their firms run better and their costs are reduced. And in October they’ll see just one more advantage accrue.

Wednesday, 21 March 2012

Social Housing solutions for the smaller Housing Association


It’s easy to think of Housing Associations in terms of the big boys with high stock levels and major infrastructure projects supplied by the big system integrators. Of course it’s a fragmented “industry” with many small HAs. They face the same compliance and regulatory needs as the large players and need to get appropriate bang for their buck too. Getting efficient can sound a little trite. But it belies the fact that massive changes like welfare benefit reform and a dour economic backdrop mean that cost savings simply have to be top of decision makers’ minds.

This month’s Housing Technology includes an article about Shian Housing‘s adoption of Invu. There are approximately 320 small associations, with fewer than 1000 units, registered with the National Housing Federation and working in London. These form the G20 group, one of which is Shian.

Invu solutions have been implemented in many HAs and the trend is positive. Many of these have been in good sized and growing HAs, like Seren, Cosmopolitan, Adactus and Derwent. The solutions have been complex at times and the results hugely positive. We’re delighted to work on these projects and we hope that these customers are enjoying the benefits they set out to achieve - the fact that they are willing to provide great testimonials and case studies is certainly positive. But the Shians of this world show that careful husbandry, very well defined scope and a pragmatic sense of ambition can allow the smaller HAs to share many of these benefits.

Invu is delighted to work with all sizes of HAs. We’re at the NHF Housing Finance Conference and Exhibition at Warwick University and TAI 2012: The Housing Olympics in Cardiff this week. Next week  we’ll be at Hitex in Edinburgh. Come and ask us about Shian and our other customers experiences.